P-POD 2016 Tallies From Attendee Evaluations….
Please SCROLL DOWN to see ALL 17 survey results!
“5” out of 5 is the best or most affirmative response in each case….
Under “Please indicate how well the conference met each of the listed learning objectives….”
(1) Identify dietary risk factors associated with development or progression of major chronic diseases, such as cardiovascular diseases, cancer and diabetes.
–86.1% scored 5 out of 5
–13.0% scored 4 out of 5
– 0.9% scored 3 out of 5
(5) Under “Please evaluate the effectiveness of each presenter (for all sessions actually attended)….”
These are COMBINED totals for ALL speakers, for “knowledge” + “delivery” + “organization” + “teaching methods” + “The instructor’s presentation(s) positively impacted my ability to provide services to patients and/or clients, and the instructor is knowledgeable in his/her subject matter and is able to communicate it effectively to the learners.”:
–75.3% scored 5 out of 5
–19.1% scored 4 out of 5
– 4.5% scored 3 out of 5
– 0.9% scored 2 out of 5
– 0.2% scored 2 out of 5
Under “Please rate the projected impact of this activity on your knowledge, competence, performance, and patient outcomes*: [competence is defined as the ability to apply knowledge, skills, and judgment in practice (knowing how to do something)]….:”
(7) This activity increased my knowledge.
–Yes: 95.5%
–No: 4.5%
(8) This activity increased my competence.
–Yes: 95.5%
–No: 4.5%
(9) This activity improved my performance.
–Yes: 90.9%
–No: 9.1%
(10) This activity will improve my patient outcomes.
–Yes: 95.5%
–No: 4.5%
(14) The content was relevant to the announced topic.
–91.9% scored 5 out of 5
— 7.0% scored 4 out of 5
— 1.1% scored 3 out of 5
(15) My personal objectives were achieved.
–76.7% scored 5 out of 5
–18.6% scored 4 out of 5
— 4.7% scored 3 out of 5
Under “Please indicate how well the conference met each of the listed learning objectives….”
(2) Describe evidence for specific protective mechanisms and health benefits that may be provided at cellular, individual and global levels via plant-based nutrition.
–85.4% scored 5 out of 5
–13.6% scored 4 out of 5
– 1.0% scored 3 out of 5
(3) Discuss how nutritional advisement emphasizing plant-based approaches may be integrated into clinical practice, thus facilitating positive, measurable and cost effective clinical outcomes for various preventable chronic diseases.
–75.8% scored 5 out of 5
–21.2% scored 4 out of 5
– 3.0% scored 3 out of 5
(4) Identify factors that influence dietary choices or discourage behavior change, as well as strategies and techniques for promoting sustainable nutritional advancement in individuals and communities.
–69.5% scored 5 out of 5
–28.9% scored 4 out of 5
– 1.6% scored 3 out of 5
(6) Under “Please indicate how well the session met each of ITS LEARNING OBJECTIVES….”
These are COMBINED totals for ALL solo presentations by speakers:
–71.9% scored 5 out of 5
–22.6% scored 4 out of 5
– 4.5% scored 3 out of 5
– 1.0% scored 2 out of 5
– 0.0% scored 1 out of 5
(11) Do you feel the activity was scientifically sound and free of commercial bias* or influence?
–Yes: 100%
–No: 0.0%
(12) The content of this activity matched my current (or potential) scope of practice.
–Yes: 100%
–No: 0.0%
(13) Overall, were the presentations balanced, objective, and scientifically rigorous?
–Yes: 100%
–No: 0.0%
(16) The sophistication of the content was appropriate for me.
–82.8% scored 5 out of 5
–11.5% scored 4 out of 5
— 2.3% scored 3 out of 5
— 3.4% scored 2 out of 5
(17) The physical environment was conducive to learning.
–73.3% scored 5 out of 5
–18.6% scored 4 out of 5
— 7.0% scored 3 out of 5
— 1.1% scored 1 out of 5
